← CCT Chessable Masters 2025 | Play-in - Swiss

Analyses

5 automatic angles of analysis across the entire tournament.

Approaching move 40

Time left on the clock just before playing the 40th move. Less time = more pressure at the time control.

Preparation depth (out of book)

First move where the player thought > 30s. The higher, the more moves their preparation covers.

Player	Average depth	Range (min / max)	Games
Sankalp Gupta	move 35.0	21 – 47	4
Keymer, Vincent	move 28.2	11 – 45	9
Donchenko, Alexander	move 27.1	17 – 44	7
Mitrabha, Guha	move 26.0	26 – 26	1
Narayanan S L

Evolution across the 14 rounds

Average time per move at each round. Shows fatigue / confidence settling in.

Opening time by ECO family

Which opening families make each player think earliest in the game.

Player	A Flank	B Semi-open	C Open	D Closed	E Indian
Abdisalimov, Abdimalik	—	—	—	7s 1 game	—
Abdusattorov, Nodirbek	8s 1 game	5s 4 games	10s 2 games	7s

Does thinking longer help?

The cost of a move is the eval lost by the player (positive = bad move). We aggregate by think duration to see if thinking more produces cleaner moves — and who benefits most.

Player:63038 moves analyzed

Median cost by think duration

Positive = the move dropped the eval (bad move). Close to 0 = neutral move. The blunder rate is the % of moves in the bucket with a cost > 150 cp.

Who does time help? (median < 1min vs > 5min)

Difference between median quality when the player thinks fast (≤ 60s) and when they think long (> 5min). Negative = their long thinks pay off. Positive = they would have done better to move faster.

Player	Fast moves (≤ 60s)	Long moves (> 5min)	Δ

Worst blunders after a long think (> 5min)

The moves where the player thought the most AND lost the most eval.

#1
Grischuk, Alexander
Move 1 · d5
6m 48s+7 cp